With the rapid development of large model technology, the application of agent technology in various fields is becoming increasingly widespread, profoundly changing people's work and lifestyles. In complex and dynamic systems, multi-agents achieve complex tasks that are difficult for a single agent to complete through division of labor and collaboration among agents. This paper discusses the integrated application of LangGraph and CrewAI. LangGraph improves the efficiency of information transmission through graph architecture, while CrewAI enhances team collaboration capabilities and system performance through intelligent task allocation and resource management. The main research contents of this paper are: (1) designing the architecture of agents based on LangGraph for precise control; (2) enhancing the capabilities of agents based on CrewAI to complete a variety of tasks. This study aims to delve into the application of LangGraph and CrewAI in multi-agent systems, providing new perspectives for the future development of agent technology, and promoting technological progress and application innovation in the field of large model intelligent agents.

The burgeoning complexity of tasks that AI agents are expected to perform necessitates a robust framework for managing work states. Traditionally, AI agents have focused on the execution of static tasks without a continuous reflective process on their work state. This limits the agents' ability to manage complex, evolving tasks that require adaptability and nuanced understanding of progress at any given moment. Recognizing the importance of dynamic task management, we introduce a novel AI agent model centered around an explicit work state. The work state captures the entirety of the agent's operational status and provides a medium for recording task evolution-from high-level planning to execution and eventual completion. This state is articulated through "work notes," a concept inspired 1

We are FORM – a product company that develops a platform to conduct inspections and surveys for our customers1-on-1 mentorship, training and advice to help users land their next job. Pay only if you succeed in getting hired and start work at a high-paying job first. Ready to find your dream job? And we want you to join our Web Team as a RoR developer! We are ambitious, we are striving for success, we create amazing things!

Tasks are a fundamental unit of work in the daily lives of people, who are increasingly using digital means to keep track of, organize, triage and act on them. These digital tools -- such as task management applications -- provide a unique opportunity to study and understand tasks and their connection to the real world, and through intelligent assistance, help people be more productive. By logging signals such as text, timestamp information, and social connectivity graphs, an increasingly rich and detailed picture of how tasks are created and organized, what makes them important, and who acts on them, can be progressively developed. Yet the context around actual task completion remains fuzzy, due to the basic disconnect between actions taken in the real world and telemetry recorded in the digital world. Thus, in this paper we compile and release a novel, real-life, large-scale dataset called MS-LaTTE that captures two core aspects of the context surrounding task completion: location and time. We describe our annotation framework and conduct a number of analyses on the data that were collected, demonstrating that it captures intuitive contextual properties for common tasks. Finally, we test the dataset on the two problems of predicting spatial and temporal task co-occurrence, concluding that predictors for co-location and co-time are both learnable, with a BERT fine-tuned model outperforming several other baselines. The MS-LaTTE dataset provides an opportunity to tackle many new modeling challenges in contextual task understanding and we hope that its release will spur future research in task intelligence more broadly.

At the 2017 HR Technology Expo and Conference, Aberdeen witnessed something startling: Human Capital Management (HCM) technology vendors were downplaying AI as they described how they were catapulting their solution agenda further ahead into the 21st century. While one of the reasons for this is that the technology is not yet living up to the visions over which Wall Street is hopelessly salivating, the reality is that HCM vendors are not on board with the elimination of people from the workforce. It simply doesn't jibe with their goals and the way they see the market. While themes related to machine learning and AI came up in conversations with these technologists, HCM vendors seemed more excited about the way advanced-stage analytics and predictive capabilities rooted in trend analyses were helping people use technology more effectively. In other words, technologists are more interested in how their creations are finally improving labor productivity.

When we think of project management tools, many of us immediately think of Microsoft Project--arguably the market leader for specialized PPM software. However, in the Software as a Service (SaaS) era, there is more choice than ever regarding project management tools, with more specific solutions targeted at different industries and use cases. There are project tools out there dedicated to task management. There are solutions that are more focused on analyzing project data and presenting it in a visually appealing way. There are project management tools which are focused more on resource planning than task management.

Artificial Intelligence is dubbed as the future and is expected to play a huge role in the HR industry. There are various startups and companies across the globe, which have launched products in the similar segment. Email software like'Zoho mail'; companies like'Workcompass' which came out with a performance management software and is doing very well. The target audience would be "Organisations with more than 100 employees". Most of the employee assessment today is done by managers, that leads to complete focus on "the person," with the possibility of bias and complexities because of reasons including their personal "traits" or behaviours.

This article published last week at Wired is rather alarmingly titled "Why Can't Anyone Make a Decent Freaking To-do App?" It looks at how the majority of the consumer public is not getting value from the litany of task management software options available out there, and contends that many people are returning to paper to help them: Most of the myriad to-do list apps are fine. Some of them are very good. But none of them has ever solved my problem--your problem--of having too much to do, too little time to do it, and a brain incapable of remembering and prioritizing it all. Which explains why the old ways remain so popular. I'm not sure there I agree that there are "no freaking decent to-do apps," but I take the writer's point. It does seem surprising that, at this late date, we still don't have a clear winner in a software category that seeks to fulfill such a basic, universal human need.

We describe an AI-enhanced task management tool developed for a military environment, which differs from office environments in important ways: differing time scales, a focus on teams collaborating on tasks instead of an individual managing her own set of diverse tasks, and a focus on tasklists and standard operating procedures instead of individual tasks. We discuss the Task Assistant prototype, our process for adapting it from an office environment to a military one, and lessons learned about developing AI technology for a high-pressure operational environment.